James Trafford: Spurs Target or Stay-at-Home Option?
James Trafford's future uncertain as Manchester City brings in Gianluigi Donnarumma, with Tottenham and Newcastle linked to loan deal.
Trafford's situation is being monitored by several clubs, but Manchester City is hesitant to let him go...
Tottenham is eyeing a loan deal for Manchester City goalkeeper James Trafford, but it's unlikely to happen as City wants to keep him. Trafford's situation at City has gotten more complicated since Gianluigi Donnarumma joined, but the club had anticipated this would happen.
Trafford is generating interest from several clubs, including Newcastle United and Aston Villa, but City is hesitant to let him go, especially on loan. They see him as an important squad member and want to keep him to provide competition for Donnarumma.
Tottenham's interest in Trafford is partly due to concerns about Guglielmo Vicario's form, and they might consider him a potential replacement. However, City is unlikely to make it easy for Trafford to leave, and they'll likely demand a substantial offer if he's to depart
🚨🏴 Tottenham want to sign James Trafford as their new number one.
— Sky Blues (@SkyBluesXtra) December 2, 2025
The Spurs could sell Vicario if an offer of at least £30m arrives, with Inter Milan among the clubs interested.
[via @TEAMtalk] pic.twitter.com/8su4U3rfGG
Gianluigi Donnarumma's arrival has pushed James Trafford down the pecking order, sparking transfer rumors with clubs like Newcastle and Tottenham showing interest. However, Newcastle's interest seems low, with sources saying they're not actively looking for a new goalkeeper.
Trafford's situation is being monitored by several clubs, but Manchester City is hesitant to let him go, especially on loan. They see him as a valuable squad member and want to keep him to provide competition for Donnarumma.
Tottenham is considering James Trafford as a potential replacement for Guglielmo Vicario, who's reportedly being eyed by Inter Milan. Trafford's situation at Manchester City has become complicated after Gianluigi Donnarumma's arrival, and he's looking for regular playing time.
The 23-year-old goalkeeper is valued at around £26m and has a contract until 2030 with City, making it tough for Spurs to secure his services. Newcastle United is also interested, but City is unlikely to approve a domestic loan, especially with their title push underway.
Manchester City isn't keen on selling James Trafford, and they're not preparing to replace him. He remains an important squad figure, and with City pushing for another title, they're not looking to let him go.
Tottenham's interest in Trafford is still speculative, and there's no clear indication they're actively considering him as a replacement for Guglielmo Vicario. City values Trafford and won't make it easy for him to leave, especially with their title push underway.
Manchester City won't let James Trafford go easily, and a substantial offer would be needed to change their minds. They're reluctant to approve a Premier League loan, especially with their title push underway.
🚨 Inter and AC Milan are both targeting Tottenham goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario as they look to bring in a new No. 1 this summer.
— Transfer News Live (@DeadlineDayLive) December 4, 2025
Spurs, meanwhile, are exploring potential replacements — including Man City’s James Trafford and Brighton’s Bart Verbruggen — though the Dutch… pic.twitter.com/elKRk92j8x
For Trafford, the lack of minutes is far from ideal, but his role at City was always expected to be a competitive one. They made no promises about regular first-team football when he joined, and he's now facing stiff competition from Gianluigi Donnarumma.
Other potential landing spots for James Trafford are scarce. Chelsea is keeping an eye on the goalkeeping market, but they're not actively pursuing him. Aston Villa is also considering him as a backup plan if Emi Martinez leaves.
Trafford's future ultimately depends on Manchester City's decision. They're the ones who'll decide whether to keep him or let him go. For now, he's in limbo, waiting to see what happens nextm

No comments:
Leave comment here